While Google celebrates Vincent Van Gogh, Eric Clapton turns 60. There's a BBC Radio 2 interview {more info} (caveat: available only for seven days after broadcast), but I'm dealing with an RTSP-unaware firewall.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8e0b/f8e0bd4b45769e9b424fa93d724e305508ce30d8" alt="Google Logo/Van Gogh 2005"
movies. music. books. raves. rants. more rants.
I am making another film with Om Puri, Paresh Rawal and Riteish Deshmukh, based on a new subject. I was supposed to make it in Malayalam, but now I will make it first in Hindi... The film is about a dead man winning a lottery, and the entire village tries to hide it and get that money.. Waking Ned Devine, anyone?
In his second interview, he even drops a note about Hungama being a remake of Poochakkoru Mookkuthi.
related: the other remakes
I still haven't managed to dig into Elmore Leonard's source novel, but friends have complained about the differences between the number of pages and the amount of footage that some characters have received. I wonder chiefly about the brevity of Robert De Niro's part. It's not that his character isn't well-defined (the script and his performance ensure that all is conveyed), but there seems to precious little for his character to do (besides providing a mostly passive participant in the events). But that minor quibble aside, I'd like to recommend this film. All the acclaim was well-deserved.
Esoteria: You can see a book called Short Blade as part of the packing for the shopping bag used in the switch. Turns out it's a book written by Peter Emshwiller. What's very Kill Bill-esque is that (according to his IMDB page) Peter Emshwiller works in other departments on films and was set dresser on Jackie Brown. Portends the Jasmine Yuen in-joke in Kill Bill Vol II that got me googlewhacked.
Other elements that I liked include: the shot of Aileen by the freeway that appears twice in the film (once as the background for the sole opening credit of the title, and once later on); the mix of Aileen's voiceover about her past counterpointing her efforts to find a job; the opening which features a flashback that uses a growing rectangle sharing the aspect ratio of the film that grows (along with Aileen) to fit the frame; the motif of the ferris wheel (the "monster" from aileen's childhood). And yes, the songs on the soundtrack.
Grouse: The only subtitles on the DVD are in Spanish; the extras aren't plentiful. But, at least you have a DVD. Go grab a copy, watch it, and be warned: it's not pleasant.
Fuels the growing fear that it might end up like Pearl Harbo(u)r (all smoke for a long long time, no fire).
Karan Johar seems to be working into the mainstream equivalent of RGV, chiefly in the way he has been providing ramps for his assistants. First it was Nikhil Advani with Kal Ho Naa Ho. And now, it's Soham Shah.
Loved that Coca Cola jingle, the chance to see a didjeridu, the nice overhead shot of a little mouse exploring the hero's boots, and the presence of The Americans Baby by Frank Moorhouse (which served as one of the two collections of short stories that this film derived its screenplay from).
And since The Big Red gets referenced so heavily, the film opens with a set of disclaimers that can only serve as instructional templates for anyone attempting to parody another big corporation:
In summary, I can see why this movie would become fodder for middle-class conversations in the dentist's waiting room. I can see why this movie could not have worked in the cinema halls. I can only hope that Gowariker manages to marry his vision and execution in his next venture and give us a film that feels more strongly about its core issues, and makes sure we understand them.
And thus we segue to some more black soup. While his latest film Black Friday {elsewhere: my notes on the soundtrack} seems doomed just like Paanch, Anurag Kashyap did not hold back in his thoughts on Bhansali's widely hailed Black.
the performances: In her directorial début Leena Yadav brings together a cast that offers to establish a new high value for the incompetence coefficient. The primary trio Sanjay Dutt, Aishwarya Rai and Zayed Khan compete for being the most prime ham on the block. Dutt's only skills only lay in the muscles department, and attempting the cerebral role of a writer consumed by his work and driven to insanity, he succeeds in defining a new threshold of pain for the audience. Rai continues to cover new milestones in looking pretty, laughing stupid, wearing ghastly attire, mouthing ridiculous lines of dialogue with the worst timing and most imbalanced accent and completely ignoring the attributes of the role in question. Zayed Khan achieves a new low and I predict that he will be one of the most successful stars in the coming years simply because he possesses all the attributes of being a star and none for being an actor of substance. And there's Kamini Khanna revising her patented act from the Dharma productions and as the puurNa\-viraam grand lady of prostitution in Julie for the role of Mrs. Kapadia The only creditable performances come from the supporting cast comprising Brijendra Kala as Ramaakaa.nt, the accomplished Sadia Siddiqui as Rajanii, and Lalit Parasher who deserved more screen time as the whacky Mr. Bhargav.
the story: Leena Yadav goes all out on her directorial début by handling writing and editing credits as well. From the looks of the film these two departments did not talk to each other. There's this irritating motif (and it's a heavy-motif) of letters cascading all over the screenscape (a tharraa-induced hangover from A Beautiful Mind) no doubt. I got the impression several times as the film plodded on that this would have been a nice starting point for an experimental play (Perhaps, it was even lifted from one?). Quite a few scenes fit better in that context than on screen (e.g. the pre-interval scene where A.ntaraa questions Shaukat's indifference and increasingly twisted view of fiction and reality; the first post-interval scene where the characters review their actions). The problem I had with the scene where A.ntaraa accuses Shaukat of living a convoluted world of fiction out of touch with reality is: this is a man who has written two books, one of which won the Booker prize; she's his wife; she should know him well enough to have seen this coming a long time ago; there is no progression from a regular writer's existence to this obsessed avataar in the film that can excuse the lack of any explanation for this showdown. Also, the nice touch of her referring to him as 'tum' instead of 'aap' is ruined by bad exposition.
unanswered questions: Don't women change from their working clothes to something more comfortable before they begin cooking? Why the hell is Sanjay Dutt dressed up in a suit while working on his novel? Is Velocity the club where sholo.n sii takes place? -- noticed a B B King poster on the walls ...
(mis)direction: Who thought that long (watch Sanjay Dutt's wristwatch carefully) lovemaking scene was erotic? A case of "all fart no sh**" IMHO. I kept thinking of a comment Kamal Hassan had made in an interview a long time ago about Hindi film songs ("like animals trying to discover sex"). The climactic sequence is a classic example of how things can go screaming to auteurial hell. It's a complete waste of time featuring people running towards each other, embraces in slow motion, and edit dissolves.
camera work: Jarring and obtrusive -- betraying a fetish for a faux-documentary-style approach.
sholay reference:tumhaaraa naam basa.ntii kyo.n nahii.n hai?
the music and songs: Vishal and Shekhar choose the Latin-American vibe for their songs, but I fail to see how that fits with the vision of the film (or was there never any intention of achieving a unity of visions?). Perhaps the choice of Goa for a bulk of the shooting had something to do with it ... As a stand-alone set, they represent a decent effort from this talented duo, but I'd recommend a dose of Buena Vista Social Club or one of Gilberto's CDs to set your perspective straight. And their efforts on the background score only give just cause to reiterate the golden rule of background scoring: never compete for foreground attention. Listen carefully and you can catch the cog from Allegro con fuoco from Dvorak's Symphony No. 9 in E minor (aka "From the New World").
the cornfields of dialogue: The dialogues department comes up with more shlocky lines in addition to providing a new example of a loathsome mix of Hindi and English. A few samples of the inanity that pervades the system follow: ha.Nsii ... kaisii? crystal-clear. jharane kii tarah(Shaukat); lekin kyaa ghar pahu.nchate hii dimaag see bhii ##exit## karavaa detii ho? (Yash); apanii a.ntaraa ko ek shabd banaa diyaa? (A.ntaraa's voiceover, providing us with the crux of the film -- as if we really cared at this point)
trends?: Should we consider the use of Sonu Nigam instead of Kumar Sanu to provide "he he he"s to the background to be a sign of progress?
trivia: Shaukat Vashisht wins the Booker Prize (see also: The Big B winning the Bookers Prize in Baghban) for a book called Mindscape. His critically panned follow-up novel is called And Time Stood Still. Interestingly, both books have the same cover design. And Walrus Publications has to be a reference to Penguin Books.
DVD quirks: Surely the subtitle ("why? 53 15") for "kyo.n" deserves mention. "Nobody understands the human mind better than Shaukat Vashisht" becomes "Nobody understands the human mind better than Shaukat wishes".
summary: The promise of the film lay in the attempts to present the process of creation, the process of a novelist working on the characters in his novel. What we get is hen-coop detritus that marks a fusion of bad acting, bad camerawork, bad editing and bad dialogue. And yes, a lot of wasteful yap-yap-yap. Since the final novel is going to be in English, why are all the proceedings in half-baked Hindi? Make a movie in English, people. You couldn't have captured the mainstream with this bucket of bull dung. Boring blabber-fest this. Rent My Dinner with André and then watch your brains blow up. In slow motion.
Filmmakers: Murnau (Nosferatu), George Waggner (The Wolf Man), Browning(Dracula, Freaks), Hitchcock, Lewton(produced Cat People and I Walked With A Zombie), Weine (The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari), Chaney (need we say more about the Man of a Thousand Faces), [and two characters whose names are not mentioned on-screen: Whale(Frankenstein) and Arnold(The Creature from the Black Lagoon)]
Death references: John Denver (died in a plane crash) songs abound in the diegetic soundscape (including a French version of Rocky Mountain High!), a magazine featuring coverage of the crash that killed Princess Diana. The murals in the boarding area foretelling the different ways that our characters meet death later in the film. The number of the beast on the luggage cart.
What a coincidence to find another reference to John Denver's death in killing your users the following day.
Meanwhile, back in India, the silent killer is finally put to good use ... to encourage tax defaulters to mend their ways. Rock on!
The problem with Taking Lives is the complete lack of any surprise or mystery. You will never really have a doubt about the true identity of Martin Asher, who has been "taking lives" -- killing people and assuming their identities and lives, because he cannot have a life of his own (thanks to his mother having showered all her affections on a now-deceased sibling). This is not to undermine the sincerity of Angelina Jolie playing a troubled FBI profiler with moody gusto. Ethan Hawke doesn't deliver all the goods. And Kiefer Sutherland's part suffers from the fact that we've seen him do parts like this before (the perceived suspect). There's definitely a section of the audience that will probably remember this film for the display of skin. There is no denying that it is a valid piece of trivia. But I really wish the film could transcend the oh-too-obvious similarities in mood to much more effective mood pieces like Se7en (what can you do? The serial killer genre is saturated). The score by Philip Glass is effective, as are some examples of the marriage of interesting camera angles and editing. And I must confess a macabre liking for the last time we see the head of Gene Rowlands (followed by a nice almost-vertigo-zoom moment for Angelina Jolie).It would seem, in the grand summation, that the denouement is not the purpose of the film. It seems most rewarding when you are in it for the journey. And it's a slickly made, decently executed journey. And yes, it's nice to see something that's officially set in Canada, instead of getting that place to pass off any any random American landscape.
ham hai.n is pal yahaa.N
That Subhash Ghai has no talent as a filmmaker is evident. That he is on the verge of being a worthy successor to Dev Anand is undeniable. And the fact that his latest film Kisna: The Warrior Poet was compared to Yaadein shows that there are still some people in the audience who haven't switched their brains off. How does one begin to outline the demerits of a venture that is DOA? Vivek Oberoi almost betters his overtly-in-love-with-myself gig in Kyon!... Ho Gaya Na(dude, you have a long way to go before you can challenge Shah Rukh Khan). Subhash Ghai made the news for roping Ustad Rashid Khan in to sing a couple of songs on the soundtrack. If the way they were used in the film (or even arranged, to begin with) are any indication, Vishal's efforts with Sanjeev Abhyankar will continue to find no challenger for several years hence.
rahegii sadaa yahaa.N
Debutante Antonia Bernath grates like there is no tomorrow. And debutante Isha Sharvani does mostly nothing but dance in this film. Someone clearly handed her the wrong idea on how to make it big in Bollywood. What's the point of all those strange poses, all that rope mallakhaamb, and all those weird facial expressions? Ghai's posturing as an artistically sensitive filmmaker reeks thanks to this sample.
ham hai.n is pal yahaa.N (piano/flute interplay)
And there's so much hamming in this film, it should have received a adults-only certificate for non-vegetarianism. Om Puri's medium rare hamming is a big big disappointment (and a blow for people who thought that he could do no wrong). Sushmita Sen's cameo is only another addition to the list of bland uninteresting characters. In her case, her part suffers from brevity. Most others, like the badly under-cooked villain Prince Raghuraj, suffer from unimaginative writing (or the complete lack thereof). To see Rajat Kapoor in this role mouthing dead parrot lines like "that's just the reassurance I wanted".
ham hai.n is pal yahaa.N (plaintively bland keyboard arrangement)
The problem with sitting through this sorry affair is that in addition to nothing being any good, there's nothing that's any bad, in a manner of speaking. The bad stuff does not even pass the simplest litmus test for putridity. You can barely chuckle at predictably bad lines like "kisnaa, ##this politics##, matalab, hamaarii dostii, ##friendship## samaapt ?" or "jiivanalaal ##katherine## ko Dhuu.NDho waranaa tumhaaraa jiivan nahii.n rahegaa" or the Om Puri-mouthed inanity "for us, love is a love is a love is a love". Om Puri does get a bearable mouthful with "chamakatii taqadiir tumhaare saamane kha.Dii hai aur tuu us pe ba.nduuk taanakar kaale dhabbe lagaa riyaa hai .. aur vo bhii ardh\-na.ngaa?". To Vivek Oberoi belongs another competent earache: "zi.ndagii me.n kabhii ... kabhii\-kabhii ham ardh\-viraam ko puurN\-viraa samajhane lagate hai.n ... lekin vo puurN\-viraam nahii.n hotaa ... puurN\-viraam to sirph jiivan ke a.ntim saa.Ns ke saath hotaa hai".
ham hai.n is pal yahaa.N (slow version)
Ghai was never someone who could present patriotism in an intelligent way, and this film has a couple of examples of people extolling the virtues of India with varying degrees of imbecility. And we also have some stupid exchanges like the following:
You could argue about the need for the violent nudity in The General's Daughter. And I might be inclined to agree, except that I can appreciate an even stronger argument for it being there -- if only to provide a suitably unsettling counterpoint to the motivations of people involved in the narrative. The plot elements are familiar, and I thought of A Few Good Men. Didn't like that one much, probably because of the presence of Tom Cruise, Demi Moore, and the undeniable aura that is Jack Nicholson. This film works well on most counts. Some of the writing is exceptionally engaging -- my favourites would be the scenes involving James Woods and John Travolta. James Cromwell lends able support, but Madeline Stowe is relegated to being a sidekick. Loved the soundtrack. Nice shots of Savannah. And the names of army bases were familiar, thanks to my day job. From a movie-monger's POV, there's John Frankenheimer's sole appearance before the camera (as General Sonnenberg) to cherish (and all of it, save the last line, done in one take). There seemed to be an oblique reference to Lethal Weapon 3 in the "I'll show you mine, you show me yours" exchange about grotesque wounds. Then there's the Casablanca dig with "We'll always have Brussels". And then there's Nietzsche ("that which does not destroy me makes me stronger"). Trivia-mongers may recall its use to open Conan the Barbarian. Two things worried me, though. That bumper sticker which said "killing for recreation". And "there are three ways of doing things: the right way, the wrong way, and the army way". Personal peeves aside, this is a decent thriller, which only fails at the denouement -- things just drop into stinkville in a most pathetic exhibition of the domino effect.
Which brings us (assume a suitable segue) to a B-grader from the personal collection, Scared to Death. The USP of this flick, according to the packaging, is that everything is told through flashback by a corpse (and this came before Sunset Boulevard!!!). The real USP is more movie-trivia-monger-friendly. This was apparently the only colour film that Bela Lugosi starred in. If you want laughs you can take comfort in some of the loud hamming that people indulge in, and the extreme theatrics (complete with Lugosi's steady standard take on the role). And you can also note the "photographed in natural colour" tagline in the opening credits. And just in case you forgot the name of the film, the final line tells you all: "she was literally scared to death".
The hungry stomach accepts no other respite but food. Despite this failure, the enthusiasm to try out a new place was still alive. So the next stop was Chowpatty (I disagree with this spelling, as with the spelling of the name of another Indian eatery Chat Patti, but that's of little consequence). There used to be another mini eatery where this place now sits -- in a strip in Decatur along with Mirch Masala and Sona Imports (among others). The gujaraatii thaalii was a well-priced option, but every order was cold, uninviting and (even if you made the leap of faith) hardly great shakes. Another thumbs down. For a similar setup, try Daabha over a year ago (sadly, they've moved to a restaurant mode of operation instead of the pay-and-collect cafeteria mode).
The final stop for the evening, if only to guarantee familiarity-based satisfaction and relief, was the over-hyped crowded Madras Sarvana Bhavan. Desserts were in order, but my chickoo milkshake looked more like the slime that put paid to the sorry lonely life of Jordy Verrill, and tasted like aspirated sandpaper. The replacement was on the house but not an adequate emollient. With three strikes, it was time to call it quits.
Since this is supposed to improve their operations, I am reminded of a few relatively related incidents about how streamlined these operations already are.
When you switch from an F-1 to an H-1B and you are about to travel back to India to get your visa stamped, you will have two I-94s (the first one is the one you had on your passport from the last time you re-entered this country, and the second is the one you received after your H-1B application was approved). Before you board the plane, the airline officers are supposed to collect both from you ("Legally" they will argue that you are supposed to hand both of them over). Apparently, if you don't do this, it may adversely impact your re-entry into the country. Well, guess what, there are people who have ended up accidentally retaining the H-1B I-94. And guess what, they're doing fine (although they do feel bad that it's still with them).
And then there's the case of someone who had shifted to an H-1B and worked for a year and a half before making a trip back. When faced with this person (who had all the mandatory documentation and as much support documentation as could be considered) who worked for an American company whose name rang no bells, the consular officer decided, driven more by self-preservation than regulation, to delay processing until a security check was performed. The person availed of the option (offered not requested) of letting the passport stay at the consulate so that once the visa was processed, the passport could just be sent back via courier, thus saving the person a second trip to make a consular appearance. Several idle cycles later, this person (who had now missed the flight back to the USA) received a phone call from the consulate and all it amounted to was that a return trip was necessary. This trip had a longer wait inside the consulate and eventually it was a mu.Nh\-dikhaa_ii of sorts. The person chose to welcome the extra vacation days rather than ponder better workflow solutions for this process.
Flash forward. Same consulate. Different person. This person worked for a very famous American company. Ended up at the consulate without even the basic mandatory documentation. This person walked out minutes later smiling with the H-1B visa stamp.
The moral of this rant: Isolated cases of success abound in the majority. Human error is omnipresent: it's excusable if it's bureaucratic; if it's the common man, forget about forgiveness. Run for your life.
The bug reports make no sense to you. You have never used the application before, so this aspect makes sense to you). On further investigation, it doesn't make sense to (a) the person who submitted it (b) the people who reviewed it (c) the people who distilled the essence of it in the notes.
You know what needs to be done to fix a bug, but at a macroscopic level. Even managerial presentations have less fluff than this. You stare at the code for long moments of time. The syntax makes sense. The IDE causes programs around it to tank. Navigability is an attribute the code never intended to boast. Modularity and separation of concerns are distant dreams. Utopia, even.
You refresh your slashdot tab and the newest article bears the title When Should You Quit Your Job?.
The most successful comedians had extremely unfunny private lives. You could take consolation in that except that you can't even fake happiness.
If you're going to read this, don't bother
Define irony. Irony is a bunch of idiots singing a song on a plane made famous by a band that died in a plane crash
Why am I soft in the middle
The rest of my life is so hard
I like to remember things my own way ... How I remembered them. Not necessarily the way they happened.
Be warned in time, James, and remain, as I do, incomprehensible: to be great is to be misunderstood